THE TRUTH BEHIND
WHAT YOU WEAR
STANDARD is a reference page.
A space where we present real comparisons, technical data, and proof of quality behind the materials we use.
If it’s STK®, it’s because it’s been tested, compared, and approved by those who understand the weight of what they wear.
Our commitment is to the truth — and to your trust.
We’re not just a brand.
We’re a shield against opportunists who put profit above your safety and trust.
This content is part of the “STK® TECHNICAL TRUTH” series:
Posts that reveal what’s behind the specs, debunk false claims, and prove — with real data — why the STK® standard exists.
CORDURA® 1000D VS GENERIC 1000D NYLON
When marketing tries to imitate durability — and fails.
MANY BRANDS USE THE TERM “MILITARY NYLON” AS IF IT MEANT QUALITY — BUT THE TRUTH IS, MOST OF THESE CHEAP FABRICS DON’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO THE PERFORMANCE OF ORIGINAL CORDURA®. Here, we show you why.
SOURCE: CORDURA® TECHNICAL GUIDE (INVISTA) – COMPARATIVE DATA ON ABRASION RESISTANCE (ASTM D3884), TENSILE STRENGTH & WEATHERING.
CARACTERÍSTICA | FEATURE | CORDURA® 1000D | NYLON 1000D GENÉRICO | GENERIC NYLON |
|---|---|---|
Surface Finish | Water-repellent + anti-abrasion | Varies |
Tensile Strength | 450–500 lbs | ~300–400 lbs |
Fiber Type | INVISTA Nylon 6.6 (high tenacity) | Common Nylon 6 or blends |
Abrasion (ASTM D3884) | Up to 20,000 cycles | ~8.000–10.000 cycles |
Weight (g/m²) | ~400–430g | ~400–430g |
Field Durability | Proven in military use | Inconsistent / variable |
ORIGINAL VELCRO®
The only name the mission trusts.
Everything else is just imitation.
YOU MIGHT CALL EVERYTHING “VELCRO” — BUT THERE’S ONLY ONE THAT OWNS THE NAME. AND IT’S NOT GENERIC.
CARACTERÍSTICA | FEATURE | VELCRO® ORIGINAL | ORIGINAL VELCRO® | GENÉRICO | GENERIC |
|---|---|---|
Temperature Resistance | -56°C a 92°C | 0°C a 60°C (average) |
Base Fabric | High-tenacity nylon | Recycled polyester |
Open/Close Cycles | +10.000 | 1.000 – 3.000 |
Tensile Strength (N/cm²) | >8.0 | 3.0 – 5.5 (varies) |
Trademark Registered | ✅ | ❌ |
YKK® ZIPPER VS GENERIC ZIPPER
A cheap zipper costs you more.
YOU CAN HAVE THE BEST FABRIC, THE BEST STITCHING, AND THE BEST CUT.
BUT IF THE ZIPPER FAILS, THE ENTIRE PRODUCT FAILS.
SOURCE: YKK Malaysia – Testing Methods Overview https://www.ykk.com.my/quality/ykk-malaysia-testing-methods
CARACTERÍSTICA | FEATURE | YKK® ORIGINAL | ORIGINAL YKK® | GENÉRICO | GENERIC |
|---|---|---|
Standardization | Global | Non-existent |
Tensile Strength | High | Low |
Closing Precision | Very high | Low, with gaps |
Opening Cycles | +10.000 cycles | 2.000 to 3.000 cycles |
Raw Material | Nylon/metal with tested alloy | Fragile plastic or metal |
REAL MOLLE (WEBBING & BARTACKS) VS LASER CUT
Looks deceive. Structure delivers.
THERE’S A BRUTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "TACTICAL LOOK" AND REAL TACTICAL GEAR.
MOLLE with stitched webbing and bartacks is trusted by the most demanding units worldwide. Laser cut looks sleek — but it’s fragile. And many brands use that to sell cheap gear disguised as “innovation.”
WHAT IS THE MOLLE SYSTEM?
MOLLE (Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment) A modular attachment system used in military and tactical gear. It allows pouches and accessories to be securely attached, customized, and configured with maximum strength.
Its foundation is the PALS standard:
PALS (Pouch Attachment Ladder System)
A grid of horizontal webbing stitched with standardized spacing (1 inch / 2.5 cm), made from high-strength polyamide webbing.
💡 PALS is the structure. MOLLE is the system that uses it.
Found on modern plate carriers, packs, and tactical platforms.
TECHNICAL COMPARISON TABLE
SOURCES:
Point Blank Enterprises
➤ https://www.pointblankenterprises.com/point-blank-body-armor/odc-laser.html
Reference to TANK TRACK™ Laser Cut technology, where they state their laser cut system was engineered to match the strength of traditional MOLLE — highlighting that traditional webbing is still the benchmark.
Skarmour Tactical Blog
➤ https://www.skarmour.com/post/laser-cut-vs-traditional-molle-which-pals-system-wins-for-modularity
A technical, unbiased analysis comparing the pros and cons of both systems — emphasizing that laser cut only comes close to traditional MOLLE when using premium multi-layer laminated materials, which is not the case for most brands on the market.
CARACTERÍSTICA | FEATURE | MOLLE TRADICIONAL | TRADITIONAL MOLLE | MOLLE LASER CUT | LASER CUT MOLLE |
|---|---|---|
Ease of Repair | High (can be stitched) | Low (cuts are hard to repair) |
Tear Risk | Low | Higher with low-quality materials |
Modularity | Excellent, PALS standard | Good, but may vary with design |
Profile | Bulkier | Thinner, more discreet |
Weight | Higher due to extra webbing | Lower, lighter design |
Durability | High (reinforced stitching) | Varies (depends on material and cut) |
Field-Tested Strength | Proven in real-world use | May be lower with inferior materials |